CRYPTO LAW PROFILE

Arizona SB 1649 Digital Assets Strategic Reserve Fund

Arizona SB 1649 was a 2026 bill to create a State Treasurer-administered Digital Assets Strategic Reserve Fund for state-held, confiscated, or surrendered digital assets. It failed House third reading on June 9, 2026.

USUS-AZRepealed§ Bill
IDENTIFIERArizona SB 1649 (2026)
ENACTED
LAST VERIFIED2026-06-11
SUMMARY

At a glance

Status

Scope

Dormancy

Administrator

LEGISLATIVE RECORD

Bill details

Bill numberSB 1649
Session57th Legislature, 2nd Regular (2026)
ChamberSenate
Legislative stage
LATEST ACTION2026-06-09Official record ↗
SPONSORSen. Mark FinchemRepublican
SOURCEState legislatureAZ BillStatusId 85288Official bill page ↗
EXPLAINER

Overview

Arizona Senate Bill 1649, titled digital assets strategic reserve fund, was a 2026 proposal in the Arizona Legislature to create a state-administered reserve for certain digital assets. The Senate-engrossed text would have added Arizona Revised Statutes section 41-181 and amended the state abandoned-property statute, section 44-308, with the State Treasurer as the central administrator. As of June 11, 2026, SB 1649 had not been enacted. The latest recorded action was a failed House third-reading vote on June 9, 2026.

Arizona Digital Assets Strategic Reserve Fund proposal

The bill would have established a Digital Assets Strategic Reserve Fund consisting of digital assets “held by, confiscated by or surrendered to” Arizona. Under the Senate-engrossed text, the State Treasurer would have been required to deposit state-held digital assets in the fund using either a secure custody solution provided through a qualified custodian or a qualifying exchange-traded product. The Treasurer would also have administered the fund.

SB 1649 would have allowed the Treasurer to invest monies deposited in the fund during a fiscal year and to loan digital assets from the fund to generate additional returns, but only if the loan did not increase financial risk to the state. The language did not itself appropriate funds or set a mandatory allocation among assets.

Eligible digital assets and benchmark language

Custody, security, and exchange-traded product provisions

SB 1649 defined a “qualified custodian” to include a federal or state-chartered bank, trust company, special purpose depository institution, certain state-regulated companies with custody of virtual currency for an approved exchange-traded product, or a technology provider of a secure custody solution. The proposed secure-custody requirements addressed private-key access, encrypted environments, hardware security, geographically diversified secure data centers, multiparty governance, action logging, code audits, penetration testing, vulnerability remediation, and disaster recovery.

The exchange-traded-product definition referred to instruments traded on a United States-regulated exchange and approved by the SEC, the CFTC, or the Arizona Department of Insurance and Financial Institutions. The provision would have allowed the Treasurer to hold eligible assets through regulated product structures rather than direct wallet custody in some circumstances.

Abandoned digital property connection

The Senate-engrossed bill also amended Arizona’s abandoned-property delivery statute. If abandoned property reported to the department was a digital asset, the holder would have delivered the asset in native form to the department or a designated qualified custodian within thirty days after reporting it abandoned. The text also addressed staking rewards and airdrops, directing certain rewards to the Bitcoin and Digital Assets Reserve Fund after three years if the property remained unclaimed.

Status and timeline for SB 1649

SB 1649 was introduced in the Senate on February 3, 2026. It passed the Senate Finance Committee on February 16, cleared Senate third reading on March 9 by a 16-13 vote, and was transmitted to the House. The House Commerce Committee and House Rules Committee advanced the bill in March, and the House Committee of the Whole reported “Do Pass” on April 15. The bill then failed House third reading on June 9, 2026, with 23 yeas, 31 nays, and six not voting.

Because SB 1649 failed that House vote and was not signed into law, this profile should be treated as a record of an Arizona digital-asset reserve proposal rather than an operative statute. Any later reconsideration, reintroduction, or successor bill should be tracked separately.

Status and timeline

2026-02-03Introduced in Senate
2026-02-16Senate Finance Committee passed
2026-03-09Passed Senate third reading
2026-04-15Advanced in House committees
2026-06-09Failed House third reading
WHAT IT DOES

Key provisions

Digital assets reserve fund

Would establish a State Treasurer-administered reserve for digital assets held by, confiscated by, or surrendered to Arizona.

Government holdingsSource ↗

Qualified custody or ETP deposits

Deposits would use a secure custody solution by a qualified custodian or a qualifying exchange-traded product registered or approved under specified criteria.

CustodySource ↗

Treasurer investment and loan authority

The State Treasurer could invest fund monies and loan digital assets only if the loan did not increase financial risk to Arizona.

Treasury powersSource ↗

Broad digital asset definition

The bill listed virtual currency, virtual coins, Bitcoin, XRP, stablecoins, NFTs, Monero, Nano, and other qualifying digital-only assets.

Asset scopeSource ↗

Abandoned digital property handling

Would require abandoned digital assets to be delivered in native form within 30 days and address staking rewards and airdrops after a three-year unclaimed period.

Asset recoverySource ↗
HISTORY

Status and timeline

Introduced in Senate

SB 1649 was introduced and read first time in the Arizona Senate.

IntroducedSource ↗

Senate Finance Committee passed

Senate Finance Committee reported Do Pass, 4-2-1.

Passed Senate third reading

The Senate passed SB 1649 on third reading, 16-13-1.

Advanced in House committees

House Committee of the Whole action was Do Pass after Commerce and Rules committee action.

In committeeSource ↗

Failed House third reading

House third reading failed, 23 yeas, 31 nays, and six not voting.

ExpiredSource ↗
COVERAGE

Who it affects

Actors

arizona-state-treasurersen-mark-finchemarizona-department-of-insurance-and-financial-institutionsarizona-legislature

Asset classes

stablecoinsnftsdigital-assetsbitcoin
PRIMARY REFERENCES

Official sources

RELATED COVERAGE

Coverage

Editorial note

SB 1649 did not become law as of June 11, 2026. This profile summarizes the Senate-engrossed bill text and procedural history for reference only.